On Tuesday, the District of Columbia joined the ranks of depravity, pushing the United States one step closer to judgment. A law that now recognizes gay marriage from other states has now come to pass it the home of our government.
It seems the proposed law was approved 12-1 by D.C. Council in May; the only dissenting council member was reportedly Marion Barry.
Our not so wonderful elected leaders in Congress had 30 days to approve the law. It seems they have final say over all D.C. city laws. The democratic controlled Congress took no action [no surprise there] and they allowed the bill to become law Tuesday, directly in line with their gay agenda. In doing so they quietly scored a political goal. You see by doing nothing, they have done everything.
Speaking of the gay agenda, they were all over this disgraceful act of whoredom and Council member David Catania proves my point. He was quoted recently as saying that recognizing same-sex marriages performed elsewhere is a first step toward performing homosexual weddings in the city.
There are currently six states which have outright slapped God in the face by allowing homosexual marriage: Connecticut, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont and New Hampshire. Interestingly enough all seem to be struggling the hardest economically. What a coweekidink.
I myself am sincerely disappointed with my elected leaders and hope that clear thinking Americans will join me in bringing our Judea Christian country back to our core values.
The first step requires self sacrifice by running for political office in order to make a real change.
Little by little, I am watching the rights and values of this great country deteriorate in a way I have never before thought possible.
If we good do nothing, evil will certainly succeed. This is no longer a fight for what is right, it has now become a fight for the salvation of our children and children's children.
Our elected leaders have the greatest moral deficit in history, far beyond that of Sodom and Gomorrah.
To stand by and do nothing is to be an accomplice to the enemy of man.
Showing posts with label Homosexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Homosexuality. Show all posts
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
True Love
In a warm and lovely tea party Monday afternoon, resident Barack Hussein Obama reiterated his undaunted support for gay rights and their causes. He and his wife, Michelle held an East Room reception Monday afternoon to celebrate the 40 year anniversary of the gay rights movement at my and the rest of clear thinking Americas expense.
Apparently Mr. Obama is a friend of gay rights activists [no surprise their] who will fight for them and with them while he is a resident of the White House [Yawn].
This all comes after the gay activist started belly aching earlier this year that Obama has not fought the never so good fight of for equal rights of homosexuals [normalizing the abnormal] hard enough in his short 6 months of office.
Of course I disagree with them and contrary to their modern belief, he’s stuck his noise in far too many times as the Chief Executive Officer of a great country on the verge of moral depravity.
In any event, we can all take heart, love one another and find some common ground.
Obama says activists will “have pretty good feelings” about the Obama administration when it leaves office.
I along with all of the clear thinking Judea – Christian American population will join them too, but obviously for different reasons.
Now that is true love.
Apparently Mr. Obama is a friend of gay rights activists [no surprise their] who will fight for them and with them while he is a resident of the White House [Yawn].
This all comes after the gay activist started belly aching earlier this year that Obama has not fought the never so good fight of for equal rights of homosexuals [normalizing the abnormal] hard enough in his short 6 months of office.
Of course I disagree with them and contrary to their modern belief, he’s stuck his noise in far too many times as the Chief Executive Officer of a great country on the verge of moral depravity.
In any event, we can all take heart, love one another and find some common ground.
Obama says activists will “have pretty good feelings” about the Obama administration when it leaves office.
I along with all of the clear thinking Judea – Christian American population will join them too, but obviously for different reasons.
Now that is true love.
Thursday, May 28, 2009
Marriage Excavation
On May 26, 2009, the California Supreme Court affirmed that marriage is only between a man and a woman. Typical to the rarely so wise court system on the left coast,they also validated thousands of same-sex "marriages" that occurred in the Golden State of California last year.
The problem began one year prior when the California Supreme Court had legalized homosexual "marriage". That all changed however under Proposition 8, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman. The purpose of Prop. 8 was a constitutional amendment, which was approved by 52 percent of voters in November, and overturned the previous ruling by the state's high court which legalized the grievous act of homosexual marriage.
The decision was correct in as much as the Court arrived at the only conclusion possible in this case: the people of California have a fundamental right to amend their own constitution.
In their normal course of inconsistency however, the court also decided that the nearly 18,000 same sex "marriages" that were held June through early November 2008 remain valid, which is contrary to the intent of the amendment.
This problem lies solely on the court when it created the problem with the first decision. As is par for the course, despite the clear voice of the majority that marriage is between a man and a woman they have succeeded in expanding the problem. In essence the court has dug itself a deeper hole by refusing to invalidate the "marriages" it allowed last year.
The justices could have hijacked the voice of the people at the ballot box, but with Sonia Sotomayer, waiting in the wings one should suppose she will lead Mr. Obama's cause in that respect.
One last note for now, another potential battle is looming over the left coast horizon. Homosexual activists are threatening a petition drive to put homosexual marriage on a future ballot in hopes of reversing Prop. 8 thus giving new meaning to grievous behavior.
The problem began one year prior when the California Supreme Court had legalized homosexual "marriage". That all changed however under Proposition 8, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman. The purpose of Prop. 8 was a constitutional amendment, which was approved by 52 percent of voters in November, and overturned the previous ruling by the state's high court which legalized the grievous act of homosexual marriage.
The decision was correct in as much as the Court arrived at the only conclusion possible in this case: the people of California have a fundamental right to amend their own constitution.
In their normal course of inconsistency however, the court also decided that the nearly 18,000 same sex "marriages" that were held June through early November 2008 remain valid, which is contrary to the intent of the amendment.
This problem lies solely on the court when it created the problem with the first decision. As is par for the course, despite the clear voice of the majority that marriage is between a man and a woman they have succeeded in expanding the problem. In essence the court has dug itself a deeper hole by refusing to invalidate the "marriages" it allowed last year.
The justices could have hijacked the voice of the people at the ballot box, but with Sonia Sotomayer, waiting in the wings one should suppose she will lead Mr. Obama's cause in that respect.
One last note for now, another potential battle is looming over the left coast horizon. Homosexual activists are threatening a petition drive to put homosexual marriage on a future ballot in hopes of reversing Prop. 8 thus giving new meaning to grievous behavior.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Forced Homosexuality
It was bad enough that the Supreme Court forced same-sex marriage on Connecticut residents but now the Connecticut General Assembly may take that decision even further. It came to my attention that there is a bill pending in the legislator that takes the forcing of homosexuality a step further.
The provisions you need to know about of a bill that is currently in the State Senate that would go far beyond the Court’s actions and force the issue of gay marriage into our public schools and weaken protections for religious groups that oppose same sex marriage.
SB 899 is billed as merely clarifying and implementing the Supreme Court's decision, but it does far more than that. Hidden in SB 899 is language that repeals Connecticut’s law stating that schools need not promote the gay lifestyle. SB 899 also undermines protections which spare religious groups which oppose gay marriage from having to recognize it.
SB 899 crosses the line and is forcing Connecticut residents a step deeper into to sin while all the time placing our Christian values in danger.
SB 899 goes too far. If passed it will allow the teaching of gay marriage in our schools and forcing religious groups to accept gay marriage, whether they like it or not.
What use to be billed as having "tolerance" is now a forced acceptance of the gay agenda over the objections of parents and churches who disagree.
The best way to tell the liberal Connecticut State Legislature that SB 899 crosses the line is to vote them out of office this fall. It is time we take our state back form the hands of the enemy. I encourage everyone, whether you are resident of the State of Connecticut or not to call (860) 240-8600, and tell the State Senate to vote NO on SB 899.
If SB 899 is passed it will trickle through the other liberal states with the help of the current White Hosue resident.
The provisions you need to know about of a bill that is currently in the State Senate that would go far beyond the Court’s actions and force the issue of gay marriage into our public schools and weaken protections for religious groups that oppose same sex marriage.
SB 899 is billed as merely clarifying and implementing the Supreme Court's decision, but it does far more than that. Hidden in SB 899 is language that repeals Connecticut’s law stating that schools need not promote the gay lifestyle. SB 899 also undermines protections which spare religious groups which oppose gay marriage from having to recognize it.
SB 899 crosses the line and is forcing Connecticut residents a step deeper into to sin while all the time placing our Christian values in danger.
SB 899 goes too far. If passed it will allow the teaching of gay marriage in our schools and forcing religious groups to accept gay marriage, whether they like it or not.
What use to be billed as having "tolerance" is now a forced acceptance of the gay agenda over the objections of parents and churches who disagree.
The best way to tell the liberal Connecticut State Legislature that SB 899 crosses the line is to vote them out of office this fall. It is time we take our state back form the hands of the enemy. I encourage everyone, whether you are resident of the State of Connecticut or not to call (860) 240-8600, and tell the State Senate to vote NO on SB 899.
If SB 899 is passed it will trickle through the other liberal states with the help of the current White Hosue resident.
Monday, April 6, 2009
Unreasonable Scrutiny
There is an unreasonable scrutiny taking place over the great pond to the right. According to a published report, the Dutch Reformed Church of Moreleta Park has found itself in hot water with it's High Court.
The report maintains that Johan Strydom, a 31 year old gay music lecture, maintains he was fired due to his homosexuality. He is now suing the Church for over R 200 000 in damages. Apparently, the plaintiff maintains he began work in the Church as a lecture and was found to be talented and gifted when it came to his musical lecturing duties in the Church, which began in January 2005.
The plaintiff further maintains he never thought it was important or relevant to divulge his homosexual lifestyle to the church as it was a personal issue. This is inspite of him knowing very well his lifestyle was contradictory to the Word of God. Moreover, sometime in July 2005, the plaintiff was approached by his supervisor and questioned about his sexuality. The plaintiff was further advised he had to attend a meeting to discuss this accusation. The plaintiff advised his supervisor that he felt it was his personal issue and did not intend on participating in the meeting.
Apparently shortly thereafter, the plaintiff was advised by a coworker, who coincidentally happened to also be gay and thought her sexuality was also a personal issue that didn't need to be disclosed; and had to attend the same type of meeting of which she happened to not want attend either. She further advised the plaintiff that they would both be terminated for their failure to attend the meetings.
Ultimately the plaintiff attended the meeting, admitted his homosexuality and was offered counseling for his homosexual oppression. Of course he declined and was promptly un-renewed for his musical lecture ministry.
Far be it from me to worry about the affairs of other countries except for the unintended consequences of this Court even hearing this case let alone to rule on it.
The fact of the matter is, liberal theological thinkers that are trying to advance their homosexual agenda very much are waiting patiently for the outcome of the case. The very fact this case has legal standing is laughable to any clear thinking person.Churches are afforded the separation of Church and State and as such their theology is their best defense. The fact that the plaintiff chose not to disclose his homosexual lifestyle, which is in direct contradiction to the Word of God, on the basis it was his personal business is laughable at best. A church should have the fundamental right to hire in accordance with their theology. The fact that the court is hearing this case suggests the instability within the Dutch Court System in it's way of thinking.
The catch 22 at home is simple. If the plaintiff prevails against the church the consequences here at home are dangerous. All it takes is a liberal federal judge to research the case and apply it to his constructionalist thinking. In turn the judge will somehow make the argument in support of the homosexual agenda. In sum the ruling becomes a law without even legislative representation and the homosexual agenda gets another notch in Satan's belt.
The Word of God warns us in Joshua 24:23 "throw away the foreigns gods that are among you and yield your hearts to the Lord," What the Word of the Lord declares is to be sure to begin the reformation now in your hearts. A man's promise to serve God loses the moral hold of the conscience if he does not instantly put it to practice.
By embracing some foreign case the ungodly become inevitably increasingly ungodly making far more difficult for all of us to yield our hearts to the Lord.
Perhaps the plaintiff should take a course in theology prior to applying for his next career move and the Dutch Court should be his study partner.
The report maintains that Johan Strydom, a 31 year old gay music lecture, maintains he was fired due to his homosexuality. He is now suing the Church for over R 200 000 in damages. Apparently, the plaintiff maintains he began work in the Church as a lecture and was found to be talented and gifted when it came to his musical lecturing duties in the Church, which began in January 2005.
The plaintiff further maintains he never thought it was important or relevant to divulge his homosexual lifestyle to the church as it was a personal issue. This is inspite of him knowing very well his lifestyle was contradictory to the Word of God. Moreover, sometime in July 2005, the plaintiff was approached by his supervisor and questioned about his sexuality. The plaintiff was further advised he had to attend a meeting to discuss this accusation. The plaintiff advised his supervisor that he felt it was his personal issue and did not intend on participating in the meeting.
Apparently shortly thereafter, the plaintiff was advised by a coworker, who coincidentally happened to also be gay and thought her sexuality was also a personal issue that didn't need to be disclosed; and had to attend the same type of meeting of which she happened to not want attend either. She further advised the plaintiff that they would both be terminated for their failure to attend the meetings.
Ultimately the plaintiff attended the meeting, admitted his homosexuality and was offered counseling for his homosexual oppression. Of course he declined and was promptly un-renewed for his musical lecture ministry.
Far be it from me to worry about the affairs of other countries except for the unintended consequences of this Court even hearing this case let alone to rule on it.
The fact of the matter is, liberal theological thinkers that are trying to advance their homosexual agenda very much are waiting patiently for the outcome of the case. The very fact this case has legal standing is laughable to any clear thinking person.Churches are afforded the separation of Church and State and as such their theology is their best defense. The fact that the plaintiff chose not to disclose his homosexual lifestyle, which is in direct contradiction to the Word of God, on the basis it was his personal business is laughable at best. A church should have the fundamental right to hire in accordance with their theology. The fact that the court is hearing this case suggests the instability within the Dutch Court System in it's way of thinking.
The catch 22 at home is simple. If the plaintiff prevails against the church the consequences here at home are dangerous. All it takes is a liberal federal judge to research the case and apply it to his constructionalist thinking. In turn the judge will somehow make the argument in support of the homosexual agenda. In sum the ruling becomes a law without even legislative representation and the homosexual agenda gets another notch in Satan's belt.
The Word of God warns us in Joshua 24:23 "throw away the foreigns gods that are among you and yield your hearts to the Lord," What the Word of the Lord declares is to be sure to begin the reformation now in your hearts. A man's promise to serve God loses the moral hold of the conscience if he does not instantly put it to practice.
By embracing some foreign case the ungodly become inevitably increasingly ungodly making far more difficult for all of us to yield our hearts to the Lord.
Perhaps the plaintiff should take a course in theology prior to applying for his next career move and the Dutch Court should be his study partner.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
The Ignorance of a Dilema
Now that Gay Marriage is official and legal in California, state prison officials face a perplexing situation. They must now try to figure out what to do with their gay inmates.
Although no prisoners so far have aggressively desired to arrange marriage with their gay partners, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation lawyers are drafting guidelines to bring the state's 33 adult prisons into compliance with the court's ruling that same sex couples must be treated the same as heterosexual couples under the California Constitution just in case.What they have determined is that the gay prisoners may marry someone outside of the correction system, but not a fellow prisoner. The rational: They need to give gay prisoners the same opportunity of rules that apply to the straight ones. Apparently prisoners have the right to marry when incarcerated.According to a recent article, spokeswoman for The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Michele Kane said "They will have the same marriage rights as other inmates - they will be able to marry non - inmates, but be barred from marrying other inmates in prison." Apparently the Department of Corrections is concerned that a stronger gay prisoner might find out that a weaker gay prisoner has money or other assets and will coerce the latter prisoner into marriage in order to claim half of their assets.I for one find that line of thinking a fine example of bureaucratic stupidity.
With all due respect Ms. Kane, under California Law, a prisoner with substantial assets must forfeit their assets to the State of California in order to allow the state the opportunity to recoup their cost of incarcerating and caring for the prisoner. All of this nonsense is the consequence of California becoming the first state to allow conjugal visits and overnight stays for inmates with same sex partners in the civilian population.
The practice of California is disturbing on at least two points.
The first and primary job of incarceration is to separate a person from the life in society and restrict their activity giving them time to improve and correct the behavior that brought them to incarceration in the first place. Allowing inmates to have conjugal visits and overnight stays is hardly a separation and restriction that would support or aid improvement and correction of behavior.
The second point being state endorsement of sinful behavior is appalling.
No one has yet to step to the plate and warn the Godless state of California of the unintended consequences of practicing ungodliness to a degree that outright thumbs their nose at the face of God.I for one shall obliged.
If there is any greater example of consequences that follow ungodly behavior receiving the wrath of God, one only has to look south to the little island of Haiti. It seems the hand of God has fallen upon that desolate and corrupt place and those that have practiced a lifestyle and worship contrary to God are now feeling His wrath.Having personally delivered over 30,000 pounds of food to the Haitians in April 2008 only to have it stolen by a local set of wolves in sheep's skin calling themselves "Pastors"; I can tell you first hand they are reaping what they have sown for years.As for our fellow Americans on the left coast: So much for vacations in the Golden State.
Although no prisoners so far have aggressively desired to arrange marriage with their gay partners, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation lawyers are drafting guidelines to bring the state's 33 adult prisons into compliance with the court's ruling that same sex couples must be treated the same as heterosexual couples under the California Constitution just in case.What they have determined is that the gay prisoners may marry someone outside of the correction system, but not a fellow prisoner. The rational: They need to give gay prisoners the same opportunity of rules that apply to the straight ones. Apparently prisoners have the right to marry when incarcerated.According to a recent article, spokeswoman for The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Michele Kane said "They will have the same marriage rights as other inmates - they will be able to marry non - inmates, but be barred from marrying other inmates in prison." Apparently the Department of Corrections is concerned that a stronger gay prisoner might find out that a weaker gay prisoner has money or other assets and will coerce the latter prisoner into marriage in order to claim half of their assets.I for one find that line of thinking a fine example of bureaucratic stupidity.
With all due respect Ms. Kane, under California Law, a prisoner with substantial assets must forfeit their assets to the State of California in order to allow the state the opportunity to recoup their cost of incarcerating and caring for the prisoner. All of this nonsense is the consequence of California becoming the first state to allow conjugal visits and overnight stays for inmates with same sex partners in the civilian population.
The practice of California is disturbing on at least two points.
The first and primary job of incarceration is to separate a person from the life in society and restrict their activity giving them time to improve and correct the behavior that brought them to incarceration in the first place. Allowing inmates to have conjugal visits and overnight stays is hardly a separation and restriction that would support or aid improvement and correction of behavior.
The second point being state endorsement of sinful behavior is appalling.
No one has yet to step to the plate and warn the Godless state of California of the unintended consequences of practicing ungodliness to a degree that outright thumbs their nose at the face of God.I for one shall obliged.
If there is any greater example of consequences that follow ungodly behavior receiving the wrath of God, one only has to look south to the little island of Haiti. It seems the hand of God has fallen upon that desolate and corrupt place and those that have practiced a lifestyle and worship contrary to God are now feeling His wrath.Having personally delivered over 30,000 pounds of food to the Haitians in April 2008 only to have it stolen by a local set of wolves in sheep's skin calling themselves "Pastors"; I can tell you first hand they are reaping what they have sown for years.As for our fellow Americans on the left coast: So much for vacations in the Golden State.
The Left goes Right for a Moment
It seems that the left coast state of California went right...at least for a moment.
On Tuesday, November 4, 2008, Proposition 8 passed by 5% of voters and banned gay marriage. Outside the gates of a Mormon temple however over 2,000 "gay-rights advocates", [or as I prefer to call them the lost sheep of the house of Israel] criticized the Mormon Faith for its role on the statewide ban on same sex marriage.Kai Cross was quoted in an AP Wire story as saying "They are on the losing side of history." Referring to the leaders of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for encouraging Mormons to donate millions of dollars to buy television time and mailings urging the passage of Proposition 8.
It seems the ballot measure was the brain child of a coalition of religious and social conservative groups comprised mainly of Mormons and Catholics.Proposition 8 amended the California Constitution to define marriage as a heterosexual act. The homosexual agenda simply refuses to accept the will of the people. Gay marriage supporters filed numerous legal challenges on November 5, 2008 against the Constitutional Amendment.
California Attorney general Jerry brown believes the marriages performed prior to the ban are still valid and he is also preparing to defend that position in court. Because there is no explicit language making the Amendment retroactive, many experts maintain the law does not void the prior marriage. This of course does not surprise me. Mr. Brown has always pushed the homosexual agenda forward. I am surprised he doesn't threaten to arrest anyone speaking out in support of Proposition 8.
I for one would like to encourage the religious conservative groups to continue to push ahead and stand strong. Despite the repeated threats by the discontented left to burn down churches and pilfer supports of Prop 8 you can be assured that God is on your side.
The act of homosexuality is ungodly and wicked according to the Word of god [Romans 1:18 NIV]. Anytime someone demonstrates in contradiction to the Word of God they can be sure the hand of God is not far from over them.
"Righteousness guards him who is blameless,But wickedness overthrows the sinner" Proverbs 13:6 NIV
On Tuesday, November 4, 2008, Proposition 8 passed by 5% of voters and banned gay marriage. Outside the gates of a Mormon temple however over 2,000 "gay-rights advocates", [or as I prefer to call them the lost sheep of the house of Israel] criticized the Mormon Faith for its role on the statewide ban on same sex marriage.Kai Cross was quoted in an AP Wire story as saying "They are on the losing side of history." Referring to the leaders of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for encouraging Mormons to donate millions of dollars to buy television time and mailings urging the passage of Proposition 8.
It seems the ballot measure was the brain child of a coalition of religious and social conservative groups comprised mainly of Mormons and Catholics.Proposition 8 amended the California Constitution to define marriage as a heterosexual act. The homosexual agenda simply refuses to accept the will of the people. Gay marriage supporters filed numerous legal challenges on November 5, 2008 against the Constitutional Amendment.
California Attorney general Jerry brown believes the marriages performed prior to the ban are still valid and he is also preparing to defend that position in court. Because there is no explicit language making the Amendment retroactive, many experts maintain the law does not void the prior marriage. This of course does not surprise me. Mr. Brown has always pushed the homosexual agenda forward. I am surprised he doesn't threaten to arrest anyone speaking out in support of Proposition 8.
I for one would like to encourage the religious conservative groups to continue to push ahead and stand strong. Despite the repeated threats by the discontented left to burn down churches and pilfer supports of Prop 8 you can be assured that God is on your side.
The act of homosexuality is ungodly and wicked according to the Word of god [Romans 1:18 NIV]. Anytime someone demonstrates in contradiction to the Word of God they can be sure the hand of God is not far from over them.
"Righteousness guards him who is blameless,But wickedness overthrows the sinner" Proverbs 13:6 NIV
Caving to Depravity
There are those out there that say I am way to hard on homosexuality. I have even had some be offended because I haved preached or blogged against it. But lets get real for a second. Lets talk about what the Bible says. Romans 1: 18-32 clearly speaks against homosexuality and how the "Wrath of God is being revealed " [NIV]. In 1Corinthians 6:9-10 says "Do not be deceived ...homosexual offenders will [not] inherit the kingdom of God." [NIV] 1Timothy 1:8-11 says that the law was not made for the righteous but the law breakers. Homosexuality is so grievous to God and there is no higher purpose for it other than carnal pleasure. We are taught that sinful nature desires what is contrary to the Spirit and the Spirit is contrary to the sinful nature. With that being said, I was not surprise to learn that the homosexual agenda once again has advanced its position.A recent case in New Jersey brought against a popular dating sight called eHarmoney found a settlement in favor of the depraved. In a settlement, contrary to the scientific approach to heterosexuality eHarmony is currently using, they have settled out of Court agreeing to provide a new site called "Compatible Partners" for gay, lesbian and bisexuals.The report further goes on to say that a Superior Court Judge in California certified a Class Action Suit against eHarmony this week giving anyone who claims to have tried to join the site for a homosexual match a right to claim damages without proving them.I find these cases most disturbing because once again the courts have legislated what free enterprise can and can not do. Why is it not relevant that eHarmony chooses to not involve itself in same sex matching.What God given right does man have to force depravity down the throats of any man regardless of what their belief is? It is not enough for the Courts to approve same sex marriages in two states but now they must force free enterprise to change their systems of beliefs.This is the un-intended consequences of tolerance, which of course I always warn against.
The Day God Cried
Today is one of the darkest days in Connecticut's history since the World began. In California, as the gay rights advocates duke it out with the children of God, we the people here in Connecticut do not have such a choice.It seems the not so honorable Judge Jonathan Silbert has scheduled a hearing to enter final judgment in a case that will allow same sex sinners to wed legally in Connecticut.Next to Massachusetts, Connecticut is the only other state that legalized gay marriage. The case is a result of the Connecticut Supreme Courts ruling 4-3 on October 10, 2008 that same sex couples have the right to wed rather than enter into a civil union that gave them the same rights as married couples.Other states like Florida, Arizona, and Arkansas have passed constitutional amendments banning same sex couples from being foster or adoptive parents. Here in Connecticut a measure allowing we the people to have a voice over the liberal democrats that force their gay agenda down our throats were not so lucky. The measure was soundly defeated giving the enforcers of Gods Word a major blow. Our "REPUBLICAN" party is filled with a bunch of wanna be democrats that truly have no moral conservative back bone at all, a trend that recent gave the Presidential Race and most Senate and House seats over the democrat's this election cycle.I for one find the high and low court rulings un-democratic and nothing more than legislating from the bench. This is a grievous offensive on all levels.The judicial system, in its legislation by litigation has now forced sin down the throats of Gods people without a choice.Christian business owners will be forced to partake in the un-godly and wicked actions of homosexual marriage by having to provide all the usual benefits afforded to heterosexual couples.There are numerous unintended consequences or gay marriage and it is time people understand this, the first being the legalization of gay marriage is very much going against God Almighty Himself.As Christians, we are not guided by worldly principles. The secular non-spirit filled society does not understand this point.The Word of God declares in 1 Corinthians 2:14 "The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned."We as Christians must re-group our Judea Christan Conservative values and retake them for the well being of society as a whole.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)